Quoting%20commentary for Bava Kamma 130:6

התורה ריבתה חמישיות הרבה בקרן אחת

The Master stated: 'The Sages however say: [Scripture says] In its principal and the fifth part thereof [implying that it is only] where money is paid as principal that a fifth has to be added, but where the money is not paid as principal, no fifth will be added.' The trespass offering will nevertheless have to be brought. Why this difference? If he has not to pay the fifth because it is written, In its principal and the fifth part thereof, why should he similarly not have to pay the trespass offering seeing it is written, In its principal and the fifth part thereof&nbsp;… and his trespass offering?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Lev. ib., 24-25. ');">⁹</span> — The Rabbis might say to you that by the particle 'eth' [occurring before the term denoting his trespass offering]<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' E.V.: 'And&nbsp;… his trespass offering, v. 25. ');">¹⁰</span>

Explore quoting%20commentary for Bava Kamma 130:6. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.